I have just read a commentary on the differences around the country in terms of starting the school year. Without getting into the length of the school year, which is in and of itself an important discussion, I do think there are two important considerations in this discussion.
The first is local needs and realities such as climate, or reportedly historically the need for labor in factories or in fields, although this latter point is disputed so the truth may be somewhere between exaggerated and untrue. In any case, a uniform national first day which ignores regional realities does seem problematic, especially as first day leads to last day which leads to a whole other set of considerations.
The second consideration concerns the end of the semester and/or the timing and length of the Winter Break. Let's say your school has the typical 180-day year, so allowing for holidays and teacher days, you would need at least 95 days or 19 weeks if you want equal semesters. Add into thei mid-smester breaks, and the last day of the semester keeps moving back. So a first day in September means school up to or even including Christmas or New Years Day. Or a shorter Semester One and a longer Semester Two and all kinds of propbelms in the last few weeks of the year including absenteeism, discipline, behavior, vandalism, arson, violence ...
This of course happens, meaning a one or two-week Winter Break which is not enough time for interstitial repairs and maintenance. student recovery or more importantly, teacher recovery and perhaps professional development.
Many schools recognize this problem and have moved to what they call "year-round" schools. This is basically a calendar of more, shorter academic periods and more, longer breaks and a shorter summer to provide this time.
I looked into this a few years ago and found an initiative in New Zrealand where they had gone from two long semesters to two short terms. The pattern was 10 weeks on plus two weeks off then ten weeks on and four weeks off (Winter), rinse and repeat (Summer). Pre-implementation opposition was dire. The end of society, the collapse of the economy, the loss of academic achievement.
However the reality was different. Attendance went up, the end of semester discipline problems disappeared, teacher burnout was not longer a thing, domestic travel and tourism significantly increased so the economy benefited, sport and arts tours and camps increase. It was an undoubted success and is no longer a topic of discussion.
My school community at the time would not buy into this so we adopted a two-semester model with four weeks in the winter and eight in the summer, and mid-smester breaks. This allowed unit-focused and project-based instruction, trips and thus absence and semester-concerts which did not interfere with programme, educational-based rather than measurement-based evaluation and more. Academcally, the school was quickly ranked one of the best in the state wih several national recognitions.
The key to this calendar was moving the first day of the year to the first Monday of August and the last to the last Friday in May. This calendar was a success against every indicator and according to thier website whic hI have just consulted, is still being implemented more than 20 years later.
The first (and last) day of the school year should be driven by schools and educators based on educational factors rather than imposed form above by belief-driven polciy-makers.
**Please leave comments and questions below.**
Further reading
https://www.edweek.org/leadership/why-does-the-start-of-the-school-year-vary-so-much/2023/09
No comments :
Post a Comment